-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Oct 12, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Stefan Tilkov wrote:
> A client API would be nice, although I'm not sure the annotation-
> driven approach makes as much sense as on the server side. But
> unless I'm mistaken, anything we'd come up with would have to be
> created in a hurry, and I don't believe there's a good enough
> chance something very good would be the result.
>
> My vote would be to stick to the original plan and postpone this to
> another JSR.
Heiko brings up a great point about the TCK. As we develop the TCK,
we're more than likely going to start encountering some type of
common means of calling the server side code. So one has to ask, if
we have to build this stuff anyway in order to provide a TCK, why not
think about formalizing the effort as well?
Ryan-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFHFKsaK/xjmUY6JwURAjL3AJ9AZnCsGufKWWKDhAAJbunPJpdn0ACfRS94
UMH+wwle3JUl2juToJzh6to=
=ibgS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----