> Instead of application/xml you need to use a media type that allows the
> client to understand what is really meant by the message. If you use
> application/xml then all the client can assume is 'process this as xml' and
> that does not get you very far :-)
humm.. good hint.. any easy-to-understand example out there?
I got your point, and agree, I just need to find out how to implement it..