On Oct 7, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
> Thanks Paul. But on your side, do you plan to move the annotations
> to the Common Annotations and, I suppose, rename them (something
> like @javax.annotation.GET instead of @javax.ws.rs.GET) ?
>
I have checked with the Servlet 3.0 spec lead. Things have changed and
Servlet 3.0 will no longer reuse those annotations. The annotations
not be renamed or moved.
Paul.
> Antonio
>
> 2008/10/7 Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com>
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm reading the servlet 3.0 specification and in the paragraph 8.1
>> it says :
>>
>> "There are a few annotations from the JAX-RS specification that are
>> being reused in this specification namely HttpMethod, GET, PUT,
>> POST, DELETE, HEAD. Eventually these annotations would move to the
>> Common Annotations specification (JSR 250) if it is shared between
>> the JAX-RS specification and this specification."
>>
>> But I can't find anything in the JAX-RS 1.0 spec about that. The
>> Common Annotations spec is only available on the 1.0 version on the
>> JCP website (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250), I can't find the
>> 1.1. Does anybody know if these annotations will end-up in Commons
>> Annotation ?
>>
>
> I am not sure, i have forwarded email to the servlet spec lead. The
> early draft review was written in May so things may have changed.
>
> Paul.
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com)
> Software architect
>
> Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org
> Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org
> Blog: jroller.com/agoncal
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal