Thanks Paul
2008/10/8 Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com>
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
> Thanks Paul. But on your side, do you plan to move the annotations to the
> Common Annotations and, I suppose, rename them (something like
> @javax.annotation.GET instead of @javax.ws.rs.GET) ?
>
>
> I have checked with the Servlet 3.0 spec lead. Things have changed and
> Servlet 3.0 will no longer reuse those annotations. The annotations not be
> renamed or moved.
>
> Paul.
>
> Antonio
>
> 2008/10/7 Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com>
>
>>
>> On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I'm reading the servlet 3.0 specification and in the paragraph 8.1 it says
>> :
>>
>> "There are a few annotations from the JAX-RS specification that are being
>> reused in this specification namely HttpMethod, GET, PUT, POST, DELETE,
>> HEAD. Eventually these annotations would move to the Common Annotations
>> specification (JSR 250) if it is shared between the JAX-RS specification
>> and this specification."
>>
>> But I can't find anything in the JAX-RS 1.0 spec about that. The Common
>> Annotations spec is only available on the 1.0 version on the JCP website (
>> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250), I can't find the 1.1. Does anybody
>> know if these annotations will end-up in Commons Annotation ?
>>
>>
>> I am not sure, i have forwarded email to the servlet spec lead. The early
>> draft review was written in May so things may have changed.
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com)
> Software architect
>
> Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org
> Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org
> Blog: jroller.com/agoncal
> LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal
>
>
>
--
--
Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com)
Software architect
Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org
Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org
Blog: jroller.com/agoncal
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal