Thanks Paul. But on your side, do you plan to move the annotations to the
Common Annotations and, I suppose, rename them (something like
@javax.annotation.GET instead of @javax.ws.rs.GET) ?
Antonio
2008/10/7 Paul Sandoz <Paul.Sandoz_at_sun.com>
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm reading the servlet 3.0 specification and in the paragraph 8.1 it says
> :
>
> "There are a few annotations from the JAX-RS specification that are being
> reused in this specification namely HttpMethod, GET, PUT, POST, DELETE,
> HEAD. Eventually these annotations would move to the Common Annotations
> specification (JSR 250) if it is shared between the JAX-RS specification
> and this specification."
>
> But I can't find anything in the JAX-RS 1.0 spec about that. The Common
> Annotations spec is only available on the 1.0 version on the JCP website (
> http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250), I can't find the 1.1. Does anybody
> know if these annotations will end-up in Commons Annotation ?
>
>
> I am not sure, i have forwarded email to the servlet spec lead. The early
> draft review was written in May so things may have changed.
>
> Paul.
>
--
--
Antonio Goncalves (antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com)
Software architect
Paris JUG leader : www.parisjug.org
Web site : www.antoniogoncalves.org
Blog: jroller.com/agoncal
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal