dev@javaserverfaces.java.net

Re: JSF 1.2 open spec defects

From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew_at_apache.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:03:03 +0100

Hi,

well.. :) I think it can wait for JSF 2.0,
but would be nice ;-)

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain_at_sun.com> wrote:
> > Hi Matthias,
> >
> > I've already submitted an MR for the locale issue. The review for that
> > will take
> > 30 days. We were even debating on whether to do an MR at all mainly because
> > it would take time away from 2.0. At any rate,
> > we would have to submit another MR after this one which would take another
> > 30 days (MRs have to be sequential). So now you are looking at 60 + days
> > out. I understand that the workaround is ugly. But can this wait for 2.0?
> > If not, then we will have to check about doing another MR.
>
> I can see that doing an MR is time consuming, but things like the mentioned
> API should really (IMO) be present in JSF 1.2 as well.
> With one of the 1.2 features (invokeOnComponent) you can do nice things...
> but somewhat that breaks other features, when using those callbacks for
> an optimized lifecycle.
>
> See the mail-thread in issue 331 for details.
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> >
> > -roger
> >
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > Hi Roger,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Roger Kitain <Roger.Kitain_at_sun.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> w/r/t the locale defect - we are looking at doing an 1.2 MR for that.
> > >>
> > >
> > > what will happen to these issues ?
> > >
> > > [1] https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=331
> > > [2] https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=332
> > >
> > > The thread in issue 331 shows why that method is missing.
> > > The workaround is kind of ugly (see my other email).
> > > The fix is *easy*; just add the method and use it instead of accessing the
> > > list of PhaseListeners directly. This won't break the TCK etc.
> > > But... it would make it much easier to write a custom lifecycle for supporting
> > > partial submits.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > >> Thanks, Roger.
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_javaserverfaces.dev.java.net
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org