+1 to expert group and the documentation.
Regards,
Cagatay Civici
PrimeFaces Lead
PrimeTek Informatics
www.primefaces.org
On Aug 19, 2015, 19:48, at 19:48, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
>+1 for E expert group, but this should be documented somewhere... I
>imagine
>it can be frustrating for users.
>
>___
>
>Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>Virtua, Inc. | http://www.virtua.com | JSF/Java EE training and
>consulting
>http://www.JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral
>+1 203-998-0403
>
>* Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: *http://
><http://blogs.jsfcentral.com/JSFNewscast/>enterprisejavanews.com
><http://ww.enterprisejavanews.com>*
>* JSFCentral Interviews Podcast:
>http://www.jsfcentral.com/resources/jsfcentralpodcasts/
>* Sign up for the JSFCentral Newsletter:
>http://oi.vresp.com/?fid=ac048d0e17
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>
>wrote:
>
>> EB> But what about the reporter's assertion that the
>> EB> javax.faces.INTERPRET_EMPTY_STRING_SUBMITTED_VALUES_AS_NULL
>parameter
>> is
>> EB> simply not effective in 2.2?
>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:47:30 -0500, manfred riem <
>> manfred.riem_at_oracle.com> said:
>>
>> MR> Hi Ed, and the rest,
>> MR> I am of the opinion that EL 3.0 broke backward compatibility and
>> MR> it should deliver a fix so pre-3.0 behavior can be
>re-established.
>>
>> MR> We should not try to do that in our runtime as
>> MR> javax.faces.INTERPRET_EMPTY_STRING_SUBMITTED_VALUES_AS_NULL
>> MR> is already a source of enough confusion.
>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:00:00 +0200, Frank Caputo <
>> frank_at_frankcaputo.de> said:
>>
>> FC> +1 for the EL expert group fixing this issue.
>>
>> Fair enough. Sometimes the sensible thing is to pass the buck.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>> --
>> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
>> | 55 Business days til JavaOne 2015
>> | 70 Business days til DOAG 2015
>>