Hi
There is plenty of ideas to do. I created this one today:
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1297
Improvements over Facelet Functions
Please consider it too. It is not difficult to do, but the only way to
make it work is inside the spec.
I'll try to submit more ideas on the next weeks.
regards,
Leonardo
2014-08-01 10:47 GMT-05:00 Edward Burns <edward.burns_at_oracle.com>:
>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 09:49:51 -0400, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> said:
>
> KM> Hello Ed,
> KM> I'm glad to see this. I couldn't help but notice that it's somewhat vague
> KM> -- is that intentional?
>
> Yes, it is intentionally more open-ended.
>
> KM> Also, I'm intrigued to see the dependency on Java
> KM> SE 8. I didn't realize that was the target platform for Java EE 8. Is the
> KM> plan to add Java 8 features to the existing APIs?
>
> SE 8 is the requirement for EE8. JSF 2.3 will be the first release of
> JSF where we abandon our long-standing policy of lagging one SE release
> behind. We don't have any special mandate to add SE 8 features to
> existing APIs, but if someone wants to suggest things, we're open to it.
> For example, I've long wondered if Lambdas can be used for flow
> definition.
>
> KM> Also, in terms of potential features/changes, OmniFaces is a very good
> KM> starting point for missing odds and ends.
>
> Yes, it is. JSF community member Ryan de Laplante has submitted a
> number of spec issues pointing to OmniFaces.
>
> Ed
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | 32 work days til JavaOne 2014