OK, thanks everyone for considering :)
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Kito Mann <kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> ___
>
> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay training and consulting
> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info
> +1 203-998-0403
>
> * See me speak at the Web Components Remote Conference, Feb 16th-17th: http://bit.ly/2iX1TeJ
> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Bauke Scholtz <balusc_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to Michael. I said pretty much the same to Arjan before.
>
> Cheers, B
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Michael Müller <michael.mueller_at_mueller-bruehl.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I understood the issue, an automated mapping to *.xhtml shall take place if nothing is configured within the web.xml?
>
> And only if the user explicitly wants to disable this new feature, then he shall add the context param?
>
> Thus, the user needs to add
> <context-param>
> <param-name>javax.faces.DISABL
> E_FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</
> param-name>
> <param-value>true</param-name>
> </context-param>
>
>
> with a value of true.
> The default is false, which does not disable the new feature.
>
> On the other hand
> <context-param>
> <param-name>javax.faces.ENABLE
> _FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</param-
> name>
> <param-value>true</param-name>
> </context-param>
>
> looks like a new feature which has to be active enabled by the user. This is not true, if the default is true.
>
> Thus, I vote to disable the new feature if not needed.
>
> I assume, most user define a mapping, thus this new context param is only rarely needed.
>
> Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
>
> Michael Müller
> Brühl, Germany
> blog.mueller-bruehl.de
> it-rezension.de
> @muellermi
>
>
> Read my books
> "Web Development with Java and JSF": https://leanpub.com/jsf
> "Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams": http://www.apress.com/de/book/9781484224861
> "Visitors" a photographic image book: https://leanpub.com/visitors
>
>
> On 12/29/2016 07:53 PM, Neil Griffin wrote:
>> Dear Friends of JSF,
>>
>> I recently added a comment to the following issue but Arjan thought that the EG mailing list was a better place for discussion:
>>
>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1434
>>
>>
>> The context-param name and default value for issue 1434 are as follows:
>>
>> <context-param>
>> <param-name>javax.faces.DISABL
>> E_FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</
>> param-name>
>> <param-value>false</param-name
>> >
>> </context-param>
>>
>> But rather than a double negative, would any of you prefer the following name and default value?
>>
>> <context-param>
>> <param-name>javax.faces.ENABLE
>> _FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</param-
>> name>
>> <param-value>true</param-name>
>> </context-param>
>>
>>
>> Best Regards to all,
>>
>> Neil
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>