Hi all,
A -0 from me, which really is a tentative -1, but I'll let Ed weigh in
on this,
As from my perspective the context-param is named correctly.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
On 1/3/17, 10:39 AM, Neil Griffin wrote:
> OK, thanks everyone for considering :)
>
>> On Jan 3, 2017, at 7:55 AM, Kito Mann<kito.mann_at_virtua.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> ___
>>
>> Kito D. Mann | @kito99 | Author, JSF in Action
>> Web Components, Polymer, JSF, PrimeFaces, Java EE, and Liferay training and consulting
>> Virtua, Inc. | virtua.tech
>> JSFCentral.com | @jsfcentral | knowesis.io - fresh Web Components info
>> +1 203-998-0403
>>
>> * See me speak at the Web Components Remote Conference, Feb 16th-17th: http://bit.ly/2iX1TeJ
>> * Listen to the Enterprise Java Newscast: http://enterprisejavanews.com
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Bauke Scholtz<balusc_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 to Michael. I said pretty much the same to Arjan before.
>>
>> Cheers, B
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Michael Müller<michael.mueller_at_mueller-bruehl.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As far as I understood the issue, an automated mapping to *.xhtml shall take place if nothing is configured within the web.xml?
>>
>> And only if the user explicitly wants to disable this new feature, then he shall add the context param?
>>
>> Thus, the user needs to add
>> <context-param>
>> <param-name>javax.faces.DISABL
>> E_FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</
>> param-name>
>> <param-value>true</param-name>
>> </context-param>
>>
>>
>> with a value of true.
>> The default is false, which does not disable the new feature.
>>
>> On the other hand
>> <context-param>
>> <param-name>javax.faces.ENABLE
>> _FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</param-
>> name>
>> <param-value>true</param-name>
>> </context-param>
>>
>> looks like a new feature which has to be active enabled by the user. This is not true, if the default is true.
>>
>> Thus, I vote to disable the new feature if not needed.
>>
>> I assume, most user define a mapping, thus this new context param is only rarely needed.
>>
>> Herzliche Grüße - Best Regards,
>>
>> Michael Müller
>> Brühl, Germany
>> blog.mueller-bruehl.de
>> it-rezension.de
>> @muellermi
>>
>>
>> Read my books
>> "Web Development with Java and JSF": https://leanpub.com/jsf
>> "Java Lambdas and Parallel Streams": http://www.apress.com/de/book/9781484224861
>> "Visitors" a photographic image book: https://leanpub.com/visitors
>>
>>
>> On 12/29/2016 07:53 PM, Neil Griffin wrote:
>>> Dear Friends of JSF,
>>>
>>> I recently added a comment to the following issue but Arjan thought that the EG mailing list was a better place for discussion:
>>>
>>> https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1434
>>>
>>>
>>> The context-param name and default value for issue 1434 are as follows:
>>>
>>> <context-param>
>>> <param-name>javax.faces.DISABL
>>> E_FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</
>>> param-name>
>>> <param-value>false</param-name
>>> </context-param>
>>>
>>> But rather than a double negative, would any of you prefer the following name and default value?
>>>
>>> <context-param>
>>> <param-name>javax.faces.ENABLE
>>> _FACESSERVLET_TO_XHTML</param-
>>> name>
>>> <param-value>true</param-name>
>>> </context-param>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best Regards to all,
>>>
>>> Neil
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>