Hi Josh,
To be 100% clear, so you only have completion of JAVASERVERFACES-4093 in 
your queue?
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Manfred Riem
On 12/29/16, 8:59 AM, Josh Juneau wrote:
> Hi Manfred/All,
>
> I have worked through JAVASERVERFACES-4093 
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093> once again and I 
> am working on creating a functional test and making it part of the 
> test suite.  It is taking me a bit of time since I'm just learning the 
> test harness/structure.  The issue is actually not a JSF problem at 
> all...things do function as expected in my opinion.
>
> Bauke picked up JAVASERVERFACES-4110 
> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110> and completed 
> it...thanks for the assistance!
>
> I read through the f:convertDateTime documentation within the 
> specification PDF and all looks good!
>
> Let me know if there's anything else I can do with respect to these 
> items.  Otherwise I will commit a pull request with the test for 4093 
> once it is completed.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com 
> <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Manfred/All,
>
>     I've not had a chance to work on the items that I'd like to finish
>     up just yet.  I should have some time over the next week with the
>     holiday.
>
>     Thanks
>
>
>     Josh Juneau
>     juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
>     http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>     https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>     <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>
>
>     On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, manfred riem
>     <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>         Hi Josh,
>
>         How is it going?
>
>         Thanks!
>
>         Kind regards,
>         Manfred Riem
>
>
>         On 12/12/16, 10:38 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>>         Hi Manfred,
>>
>>         Glad to see things moving forward.  I think some of the
>>         recently discussed issues/enhancements would be nice to see
>>         as part of JSF 2.3.  However, I can certainly understand the
>>         need to start ramping down on the JSR.
>>
>>         1) have done:
>>
>>         - Helped out with JAVASERVERFACES-1370 (Provide Converters
>>         for Date-Time API)
>>
>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4066
>>         <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4066> Troubleshooted
>>         and determined it was not an issue
>>
>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4110:  Provided bug fix and committed.
>>
>>         2)  Currently Doing:
>>
>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4093
>>         <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093>:  I
>>         should be able to finish this...need to supply a functional test.
>>
>>         - JAVASERVERFACES-4110
>>         <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110>:  I'll
>>         certainly try to get this one worked out soon
>>
>>         3)  Not going to do:
>>
>>         I don't have anything else assigned to me at this time.  I
>>         was planning to help sift through the open issues but I am
>>         not sure if I'll have time to do so.
>>
>>         Hope this helps.  I do not think there would need to be any
>>         text in the specification, other than the date-time API
>>         enhancements.  Thanks
>>
>>         Josh Juneau
>>         juneau001_at_gmail.com <mailto:juneau001_at_gmail.com>
>>         http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>>         https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>         <https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866>
>>
>>
>>         On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, manfred riem
>>         <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com <mailto:manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Josh,
>>
>>             Can you please tell me what issues you
>>
>>             1) have done
>>             2) are currently doing (and which can be completed and
>>             which is not)
>>             3) are not going to do
>>
>>             And for 1) and 2) if there is going to be a need for any
>>             text in the
>>             Specification (the PDF document).
>>
>>             Kind regards,
>>             Manfred Riem
>>
>>
>
>