jsr372-experts@javaserverfaces-spec-public.java.net

[jsr372-experts] Re: Status for Josh

From: Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 09:59:24 -0600

Hi Manfred/All,

I have worked through JAVASERVERFACES-4093
<https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093> once again and I am
working on creating a functional test and making it part of the test
suite. It is taking me a bit of time since I'm just learning the test
harness/structure. The issue is actually not a JSF problem at all...things
do function as expected in my opinion.

Bauke picked up JAVASERVERFACES-4110
<https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110> and completed
it...thanks for the assistance!

I read through the f:convertDateTime documentation within the specification
PDF and all looks good!

Let me know if there's anything else I can do with respect to these items.
Otherwise I will commit a pull request with the test for 4093 once it is
completed.

Thanks


Josh Juneau
juneau001_at_gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866


On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Josh Juneau <juneau001_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Manfred/All,
>
> I've not had a chance to work on the items that I'd like to finish up just
> yet. I should have some time over the next week with the holiday.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> How is it going?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Manfred Riem
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/16, 10:38 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>>
>> Hi Manfred,
>>
>> Glad to see things moving forward. I think some of the recently
>> discussed issues/enhancements would be nice to see as part of JSF 2.3.
>> However, I can certainly understand the need to start ramping down on the
>> JSR.
>>
>> 1) have done:
>>
>> - Helped out with JAVASERVERFACES-1370 (Provide Converters for Date-Time
>> API)
>>
>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4066
>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4066> Troubleshooted and
>> determined it was not an issue
>>
>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4110: Provided bug fix and committed.
>>
>> 2) Currently Doing:
>>
>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4093
>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093>: I should be able
>> to finish this...need to supply a functional test.
>>
>> - JAVASERVERFACES-4110
>> <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110>: I'll certainly try
>> to get this one worked out soon
>>
>> 3) Not going to do:
>>
>> I don't have anything else assigned to me at this time. I was planning
>> to help sift through the open issues but I am not sure if I'll have time to
>> do so.
>>
>> Hope this helps. I do not think there would need to be any text in the
>> specification, other than the date-time API enhancements. Thanks
>>
>> Josh Juneau
>> juneau001_at_gmail.com
>> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
>> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Josh,
>>>
>>> Can you please tell me what issues you
>>>
>>> 1) have done
>>> 2) are currently doing (and which can be completed and which is not)
>>> 3) are not going to do
>>>
>>> And for 1) and 2) if there is going to be a need for any text in the
>>> Specification (the PDF document).
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Manfred Riem
>>>
>>>
>>
>