Hi Manfred/All,
I've not had a chance to work on the items that I'd like to finish up just
yet. I should have some time over the next week with the holiday.
Thanks
Josh Juneau
juneau001_at_gmail.com
http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:10 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
wrote:
> Hi Josh,
>
> How is it going?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
>
> On 12/12/16, 10:38 PM, Josh Juneau wrote:
>
> Hi Manfred,
>
> Glad to see things moving forward. I think some of the recently discussed
> issues/enhancements would be nice to see as part of JSF 2.3. However, I
> can certainly understand the need to start ramping down on the JSR.
>
> 1) have done:
>
> - Helped out with JAVASERVERFACES-1370 (Provide Converters for Date-Time
> API)
>
> - JAVASERVERFACES-4066 <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4066>
> Troubleshooted and determined it was not an issue
>
> - JAVASERVERFACES-4110: Provided bug fix and committed.
>
> 2) Currently Doing:
>
> - JAVASERVERFACES-4093 <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4093>:
> I should be able to finish this...need to supply a functional test.
>
> - JAVASERVERFACES-4110 <https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4110>:
> I'll certainly try to get this one worked out soon
>
> 3) Not going to do:
>
> I don't have anything else assigned to me at this time. I was planning to
> help sift through the open issues but I am not sure if I'll have time to do
> so.
>
> Hope this helps. I do not think there would need to be any text in the
> specification, other than the date-time API enhancements. Thanks
>
> Josh Juneau
> juneau001_at_gmail.com
> http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com
> https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM, manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Josh,
>>
>> Can you please tell me what issues you
>>
>> 1) have done
>> 2) are currently doing (and which can be completed and which is not)
>> 3) are not going to do
>>
>> And for 1) and 2) if there is going to be a need for any text in the
>> Specification (the PDF document).
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Manfred Riem
>>
>>
>