The Liferay Faces team is working on the following RI issues:
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4208
https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES-4217
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Leonardo Uribe <leonardo.uribe_at_irian.at> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> This is my list of issues that I have not seen how it looks like yet because
> they are not on the spec or the API is not mature enough, and I'm waiting
> to review them on public review.
>
> Please note I have a partial vision of what is going on in the code, mostly
> gathered from the javadoc and spec updates, so my personal views could
> be outdated.
>
> - https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1423
> Dynamic Resource Loading: Some observations were mentioned on the list
> about resource ordering, but the latest API does not reflect them (not 100% sure).
> Use getEvalScripts() looks insufficient to the goal, because it is not a general
> solution to the problem (how to update CSS resources?). Update <head> or
> <body> scripts individually looks not properly covered.
>
> - https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1260
> Extensionless paths: It was discussed a year ago, but no idea how it looks like.
> Some things added to the spec. Was META-INF/views (specific directory
> for views) approved?
>
> - Ajax Method Invocation h:commandScript : handling of tag with no name and
> with id (generated name) was discussed but I do not know if something was
> done here.
>
> - Better CDI Integration: waiting to see if @ResolveComponent can be
> included in JSF 2.3 (optional but strongly wanted).
>
> If these issue are handled, I can consider from my side the EG implementation done.
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
>
> 2017-01-19 12:57 GMT-05:00 manfred riem <manfred.riem_at_oracle.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any leftover EG implementation work to be done?
>
> Please let us know as soon as possible.
>
> Remember the close down for that work is 1/27.
>
> For your reference, see https://java.net/projects/javaserverfaces-spec-public/lists/users/archive/2017-01/message/36
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
>