Using only prefix mapping sounds limiting. Frankly #{resource} does the job for me.
On 29.Şub.2012, at 23:31, Edward Burns wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:31:39 +0100, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korherr_at_gmail.com> said:
>
> JK> Hi Ed,
> JK> I uploaded the broken sample and added my comments to the issue at
> JK> http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-947
>
> Looking at JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-947 and
> JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-884, and your implementation of
> RelativeResourceHandler, I have to ask the expert group if it's
> acceptable to state that relative resources simply will not work unless
> you are using prefix mapping?
>
> Jakob, you made this simplifying assumption in your
> RelativeResourceHandler and I can't see how we can meet your
> requirements in the spec without doing the same.
>
> Is everyone on board with that?
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
Çağatay Çivici
Principal Consultant
PrimeFaces Lead | JSF EG Member
Prime Teknoloji
Bilkent Cyberpark, A-303d
06800 Ankara/Turkey
Tel: +90 312 265 05 07
http://www.prime.com.tr