On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Çağatay Çivici
<cagatay.civici_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Using only prefix mapping sounds limiting. Frankly #{resource} does the job
> for me.
>
That's a pretty hefty performance impact we talk about here, if every
CSS file needs to be parsed.
prefix mapping is fine!
best regards,
Martin
> On 29.Şub.2012, at 23:31, Edward Burns wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:31:39 +0100, Jakob Korherr <jakob.korherr_at_gmail.com>
> said:
>
>
> JK> Hi Ed,
> JK> I uploaded the broken sample and added my comments to the issue at
> JK> http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-947
>
> Looking at JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-947 and
> JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-884, and your implementation of
> RelativeResourceHandler, I have to ask the expert group if it's
> acceptable to state that relative resources simply will not work unless
> you are using prefix mapping?
>
> Jakob, you made this simplifying assumption in your
> RelativeResourceHandler and I can't see how we can meet your
> requirements in the spec without doing the same.
>
> Is everyone on board with that?
>
> Ed
>
> --
> | edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>
>
> Çağatay Çivici
> Principal Consultant
> PrimeFaces Lead | JSF EG Member
>
> Prime Teknoloji
> Bilkent Cyberpark, A-303d
> 06800 Ankara/Turkey
> Tel: +90 312 265 05 07
> http://www.prime.com.tr
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces