Hi Kevin,
On 2/11/15 12:25 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Thanks, Linda. I missed this query from Bill. My preference is
> "B. Any class that also supports injection (table EE-5.1)" from Bill's
> original inquiry. Bill's note indicates that the responses to his
> inquiry were mixed between B and D. But, it looks like this MR is going
> with option
> "C. Any class in the application package (ear/war/jar file)"? Are we
> too late to re-open this discussion?
>
Well, yes and no....
This clarification was intended to resolve an ambiguity in the spec,
where some sections (specifically 8.5.2) indicated that all
classes that are part of the application package need to be
scanned, but others (e.g., 5.2.5) made reference to classes supporting
injection.
We believe that option C is therefore the most consistent with the
intent of the spec, as well as the more straightforward to implement,
particularly since at deployment (before CDI kicks in) one may not be
able to easily identify what is or is not a CDI managed bean.
-Linda
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Sutter
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>
> To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
> Date: 02/11/2015 01:58 PM
> Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Re: Java EE 7 MR
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> It means any class in the ear/war/jar, depending on how the application
> is packaged. It does not include classes in external libraries.
>
> Please see
> https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/lists/jsr366-experts/archive/2015-02/message/1
> for further on this.
>
> -Linda
>
>
> On 2/11/15 11:49 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> > Hi Antonio and Linda,
> > Does this "on any class in the application package" really mean "any
> > class"? Or, is this just trying to expand the current wording to also
> > include other component classes like CDI beans that are in the
> > application? I'm concerned about the implication of scanning every
> > class in the application for annotations.
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Kevin Sutter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>
> > To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
> > Date: 02/11/2015 05:27 AM
> > Subject: [jsr366-experts] Re: [javaee-spec users] Java EE 7 MR
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Linda,
> >
> > I like the "on any class in the application package." makes it clearer
> > and simpler.
> >
> > Thanks for that
> > Antonio
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Linda DeMichiel
> > <_linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com_ <mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>> wrote:
> >
> > We've been accumulating a few fixes to minor errors in the Java
> > EE 7 specification along with some clarifications that we've been
> > discussing recently in the group. We plan to submit these to the JCP
> > as part of the spec Maintenance process. I've attached a list of the
> > proposed changes below.
> >
> > Note that because these changes do not impact the RI or TCK, but only
> > update the current specification document, they do not define a new
> > spec version, but rather result in a "Rev A" of the Java EE 7
> > specification.
> >
> > I plan to submit these to the JCP at the end of the week to initiate
> > the Maintenance Review process. Please let me know before then if I
> > missed anything or if you have any comments.
> >
> > For your convenience, I have uploaded a draft of the spec
> > that includes the proposed changes to our project downloads area,_
> > __https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/downloads_.
> > The changes are flagged with changebars in the relevant chapters.
> >
> > -Linda
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Antonio Goncalves
> > Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
> > _
> > __Web site_ <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | _Twitter_
> > <http://twitter.com/agoncal>| _LinkedIn_
> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | _Pluralsight_
> > <http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> |
> > _Paris JUG_ <http://www.parisjug.org/> | _Devoxx France_
> > <http://www.devoxx.fr/>
>
>