users@javaee-spec.java.net

[javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Re: Re: Java EE 7 MR

From: Kevin Sutter <sutter_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:25:38 -0600

Thanks, Linda. I missed this query from Bill. My preference is "
B. Any class that also supports injection (table EE-5.1)" from Bill's
original inquiry. Bill's note indicates that the responses to his inquiry
were mixed between B and D. But, it looks like this MR is going with
option "C. Any class in the application package (ear/war/jar file)"? Are
we too late to re-open this discussion?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter

 



From: Linda DeMichiel <linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>
To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
Date: 02/11/2015 01:58 PM
Subject: [javaee-spec users] [jsr366-experts] Re: Java EE 7 MR



Hi Kevin,

It means any class in the ear/war/jar, depending on how the application
is packaged. It does not include classes in external libraries.

Please see
https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/lists/jsr366-experts/archive/2015-02/message/1

for further on this.

-Linda


On 2/11/15 11:49 AM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Hi Antonio and Linda,
> Does this "on any class in the application package" really mean "any
> class"? Or, is this just trying to expand the current wording to also
> include other component classes like CDI beans that are in the
> application? I'm concerned about the implication of scanning every
> class in the application for annotations.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Sutter
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>
> To: jsr366-experts_at_javaee-spec.java.net
> Date: 02/11/2015 05:27 AM
> Subject: [jsr366-experts] Re: [javaee-spec users] Java EE 7 MR
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi Linda,
>
> I like the "on any class in the application package." makes it clearer
> and simpler.
>
> Thanks for that
> Antonio
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Linda DeMichiel
> <_linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com_ <mailto:linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>>
wrote:
>
> We've been accumulating a few fixes to minor errors in the Java
> EE 7 specification along with some clarifications that we've been
> discussing recently in the group. We plan to submit these to the JCP
> as part of the spec Maintenance process. I've attached a list of the
> proposed changes below.
>
> Note that because these changes do not impact the RI or TCK, but only
> update the current specification document, they do not define a new
> spec version, but rather result in a "Rev A" of the Java EE 7
> specification.
>
> I plan to submit these to the JCP at the end of the week to initiate
> the Maintenance Review process. Please let me know before then if I
> missed anything or if you have any comments.
>
> For your convenience, I have uploaded a draft of the spec
> that includes the proposed changes to our project downloads area,_
> __https://java.net/projects/javaee-spec/downloads_.
> The changes are flagged with changebars in the relevant chapters.
>
> -Linda
>
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
> _
> __Web site_ <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org/> | _Twitter_
> <http://twitter.com/agoncal>| _LinkedIn_
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | _Pluralsight_
> <http://pluralsight.com/training/Authors/Details/antonio-goncalves> |
> _Paris JUG_ <http://www.parisjug.org/> | _Devoxx France_
> <http://www.devoxx.fr/>