On 06/11/2012 18:32, Werner Keil wrote:
> Things like "Mobile JMS" certainly could benefit even the newly revived ME/Embedded side, e.g. for M2M specific
> Messaging protocols, or my old Agorava (JSR 357) idea of using JMS to send Social Messages like Twitter
>
> However, if CDI is becoming more portable and usable by SE with 2.0, maybe JMS 2.0 should also try to open itself up,
> but I am not sure, if that's gonna happen with its 2.0 release yet
In JMS 2.0 we've specified
@Inject private JMSContext context;
as a required feature in a Java EE container only.
This is @TransactionScoped if there's a JTA transaction, @RequestScoped if not.
JMS 2.0 does not require this to be supported in a Java SE environment. Not does it define how it might work in Java SE
(I see finding an appropriate scope to use in Java SE as the main issue).
Nigel
> Cheers,
>
> --
>
> Werner Keil | JCP Executive Committee Member | Eclipse UOMo Lead| Java Godfather
>
> Twitter @wernerkeil | #Java_Social | #EclipseUOMo | #OpenDDR
>
> Skype werner.keil | Google+ gplus.to/wernerkeil <http://gplus.to/wernerkeil>
>
> * DevoXX: November 13 2012, Antwerp, Belgium. Werner Keil, JCP EC Member and Agorava Committer, will present "Java
> Social JSR, it's alive"
>
> * Eclipse DemoCamp: November 21 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. Werner Keil, Eclipse UOMo Lead and Mærsk Build Manager will
> present "Eclipse M2M and Standards for the IoT"
>
> * Eclipse DemoCamp: November 26 2012, Berlin, Germany. Werner Keil, Eclipse UOMo Lead and Mærsk Build Manager will
> present "Eclipse M2M and Standards for the IoT"
>
> * Eclipse DemoCamp: November 30 2012, Vienna, Austria. Werner Keil, Eclipse UOMo Lead and Mærsk Build Manager will
> present "Triple-E class Continuous Delivery with Hudson, Maven, Kokki and PyDev"
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com <mailto:antonio.goncalves_at_gmail.com>>
> wrote:
>
> SE support would help all those JSRs that don't want to rely on CDI (embedded in a EE container) such as JMS.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Werner Keil <werner.keil_at_gmail.com <mailto:werner.keil_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Well, if it's SE support it may not hurt EE as much, if there was a way to get this or 330 into SE 8 (at least
> in some "Profile") it would be phantastic, knowing, the SE 8 "bag" has almost closed, and most of these useful
> additions may require the Jigsaw mess sorted out with Java 9 first
>
>
>
>
> --
> Antonio Goncalves
> Software architect and Java Champion
>
> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>
>
>
>
>