Linda, Batch (EE.6.17) is missing from Table EE.6-1 and there is no mention
of JCache (but that might be normal as it just got in)
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Linda DeMichiel
<linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
>
> On 11/5/2012 4:41 AM, Antonio Goncalves wrote:
>
>> Hi Linda,
>>
>> Just a couple of spec version mistake I recon :
>>
>> * EE.6.5 JavaServer Pages™ (JSP) *2.2* Requirements : Should be JSP
>> *2.3*
>> * EE.6.9 JavaMail™ *1.4* Requirements : Should be *1.5*
>> * EE.6.10 Java EE™ Connector Architecture *1.6* Requirements : Should
>> be *1.7*
>>
>>
> Yes, you are right. I should have noted that I haven't finished updating
> version numbers for MRs,
> pending whether their changes would cause a version number update or not.
> I will fix this in
> the Public Review Draft of the spec.
>
>
>
>> BTW, EE.5.20 / 21 talks about default Data Source & JMS Factory. But what
>> about the producers which will allow us to
>> just go @Inject DataSource. We talked about it in the ML but I don't see
>> anyting in the spec.
>>
>>
> Default producers are on the RFE list. We are still currently
> investigating this and tracking as an issue
> http://java.net/jira/browse/**JAVAEE_SPEC-14<http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVAEE_SPEC-14>
> .
>
> regards,
>
> -Linda
>
>
>
> Antonio
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Linda DeMichiel <
>> linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com <mailto:linda.demichiel@**oracle.com<linda.demichiel_at_oracle.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've just uploaded revised drafts of the Java EE Platform and Web
>> Profile specifications to javaee-spec.java.net/downloads <
>> http://javaee-spec.java.net/**downloads<http://javaee-spec.java.net/downloads>>__.
>> These
>>
>> drafts include the following additions as well as the changes to
>> reflect the Java EE 7 roadmap changes we announced earlier this month:
>> Java EE security manager requirements and permission declaration
>> syntax
>> Password aliasing
>> Requirements for the inclusion of support for WebSocket, JSON-P,
>> and Batch
>> in the full Platform; and for WebSocket and JSON-P in the Web
>> Profile.
>>
>> The changebars show the changes since the Early Draft. If there is
>> any
>> reason you think we should not submit these drafts to the JCP as an
>> Early Draft 2, please let me know.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> -Linda
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Antonio Goncalves
>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>
>> Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.**org<http://www.antoniogoncalves.org>>
>> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/agoncal> | LinkedIn
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/**agoncal<http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal>>
>> | Paris JUG <http://www.parisjug.org> | Devoxx France <
>> http://www.devoxx.fr>
>>
>
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect and Java Champion
Web site <http://www.antoniogoncalves.org> |
Twitter<http://twitter.com/agoncal>|
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/agoncal> | Paris
JUG<http://www.parisjug.org> |
Devoxx France <http://www.devoxx.fr>