On 09/15/08 11:43 AM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Salut,
>
> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>> I hope the name has no bearing here, but I am not sure. I should be able
>> to name the JK connector as "foo", right JF?
>
> We don't have any way to tell GF that a specific connector is mod_jk
> enabled. Hence Amy cames with the idea (or Jan?) to have a special
> name. For sure jdk-connector is not correct :-) It should be
> jk-connector.
>
> Now using the name attribute might not be a good idea. I would instead
> propose adding a property under <http-listener> with:
>
> <property name="jkSupport" value="true"/>
>
> so it follow our normal convention. Jan/Amy/Kedar, what do you think?
Love the idea!
As for the name of the property, I'd prefer something like "jkEnabled".
Thanks!
Jan
>
> A+
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
>
>>
>> -Kedar
>>
>> Survivant 00 wrote:
>>> note sure if I'm in the right mailing-list.
>>>
>>> I try the listener jk-mod for GF v3.. based on JF Arcand's blog,
>>> but it doesn't work with b24. It's named jdk-connector not
>>> jk-connector. Which one is the good name ?
>>>
>>> here the bug issue :
>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5975
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>