Salut,
Jan Luehe wrote:
> On 09/15/08 11:43 AM, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>> Salut,
>>
>> Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>> I hope the name has no bearing here, but I am not sure. I should be able
>>> to name the JK connector as "foo", right JF?
>>
>> We don't have any way to tell GF that a specific connector is mod_jk
>> enabled. Hence Amy cames with the idea (or Jan?) to have a special
>> name. For sure jdk-connector is not correct :-) It should be
>> jk-connector.
>>
>> Now using the name attribute might not be a good idea. I would instead
>> propose adding a property under <http-listener> with:
>>
>> <property name="jkSupport" value="true"/>
>>
>> so it follow our normal convention. Jan/Amy/Kedar, what do you think?
>
> Love the idea!
>
> As for the name of the property, I'd prefer something like "jkEnabled".
OK...i was following the cometSupport/rcmSupport property we already
support :-) Amy, can you work on implementing the property?
Thanks!
-- Jeanfrancois
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jan
>
>
>>
>> A+
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -Kedar
>>>
>>> Survivant 00 wrote:
>>>> note sure if I'm in the right mailing-list.
>>>>
>>>> I try the listener jk-mod for GF v3.. based on JF Arcand's blog,
>>>> but it doesn't work with b24. It's named jdk-connector not
>>>> jk-connector. Which one is the good name ?
>>>>
>>>> here the bug issue :
>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5975
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>