Salut,
Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
> I hope the name has no bearing here, but I am not sure. I should be able
> to name the JK connector as "foo", right JF?
We don't have any way to tell GF that a specific connector is mod_jk
enabled. Hence Amy cames with the idea (or Jan?) to have a special name.
For sure jdk-connector is not correct :-) It should be jk-connector.
Now using the name attribute might not be a good idea. I would instead
propose adding a property under <http-listener> with:
<property name="jkSupport" value="true"/>
so it follow our normal convention. Jan/Amy/Kedar, what do you think?
A+
-- Jeanfrancois
>
> -Kedar
>
> Survivant 00 wrote:
>> note sure if I'm in the right mailing-list.
>>
>> I try the listener jk-mod for GF v3.. based on JF Arcand's blog, but
>> it doesn't work with b24. It's named jdk-connector not jk-connector.
>> Which one is the good name ?
>>
>> here the bug issue :
>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5975
>>
>>
>> thanks
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>