+1 for renaming.
I also noticed, that let's say framework.jar is not perfect name, when
it's used outside project Grizzly scope :)
WBR,
Alexey.
Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose two changes:
>
> (1) Rename archetype produced by Maven and happens 'grizzly' for the
> jar, e.g.:
>
> http-1.7.0.jar would becomes grizzly-http-1.7.0.jar
> framework-1.7.0 would becomes grizzly-framework-1.7.0.jar
> etc.
>
> (2) Pending Scott proposal and Jruby/DoS issues we are currently
> discussing, I would like to cut 1.7.0 release tomorrow or Monday. We
> have added significant numbers of new features as an official release
> is probably required :-) Based on Ken proposal, I would like to jump
> from 1.6.1 to 1.7.0. I would then integrate 1.7.0 in a variety of
> products like GlassFish v3, Sailfin, Jersey, Jetty, etc. I will be on
> the road for the next two weeks and having an official release to
> demonstrate for the Grizzly's Javapolis talk will be nice :-)
>
> What peoples thinks? Everybody (not only commiters) can talk!
>
> -- Jeanfrancois
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>