Oleksiy Stashok wrote:
>
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 4:21 , Jan Luehe wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/09 09:34, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin Lee wrote:
>>>> Does this even make sense on <http> for grizzly? It's in the
>>>> mapping but I'm not sure about it.
>>>
>>> I would vote for a property instead of an attribute. That way we can
>>> add it in GF without overloading Grizzly. Jan, what do you think?
>>
>> Or could we make it an OPTIONAL attribute? (I know it is REQUIRED as
>> per the current
>> domain.xml DTD definition.) This way, it could always be omitted in
>> Grizzly.
>
> Once we don't plan to have dtd for GFv3, I'd also prefer to have
> OPTIONAL attribute.
OK then let's use an attribute, but as usual, I just think we overload
the definition with something Grizzly will never use :-)
A+
--Jeanfrancois
>
> WBR,
> Alexey.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>>
>>> A+
>>>
>>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>