On Jan 14, 2009, at 4:21 , Jan Luehe wrote:
> On 01/13/09 09:34, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
>>
>>
>> Justin Lee wrote:
>>> Does this even make sense on <http> for grizzly? It's in the
>>> mapping but I'm not sure about it.
>>
>> I would vote for a property instead of an attribute. That way we
>> can add it in GF without overloading Grizzly. Jan, what do you think?
>
> Or could we make it an OPTIONAL attribute? (I know it is REQUIRED as
> per the current
> domain.xml DTD definition.) This way, it could always be omitted in
> Grizzly.
Once we don't plan to have dtd for GFv3, I'd also prefer to have
OPTIONAL attribute.
WBR,
Alexey.
>
>
> Jan
>
>>
>> A+
>>
>> -- Jeanfrancois
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_grizzly.dev.java.net
>