Hi -
I'm not sure I understood your question.
It sounds like you have a working program, right? With a separate nav
file? So... what's the problem you are encountering?
Jim
P.S. Out of curiosity, why not just use implicit navigation?
On 1/14/10 11:29 PM, webtier_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
> Hey there!!
>
> I'm new on the board and also new on JSF 2.0.
>
> I'm using Netbeans 6.8 and try to write a little webapplication using
> EJBs and JSF 2.0.
>
> I'd like to separate Navigation-rules from the faces-config.xml.
>
> so I write a:
> faces-config.xml containing application-Section placed in /WEB-INF and
> a navigation.faces-config.xml placed in /META-INF.
>
> As described in: Proposed Final Draft from JavaServer™ Faces
> Specification in section 11.4.2.
> ...
> * Search for all resources that match either
> “META-INF/faces-config.xml” or the end with “.faces-config.xml”
> directly in the “META-INF” directory. Each resource that matches that
> expression must be considered an application configuration resource.
> ...
>
> this should work or I wrong?
>
> When I add javax.faces.CONFIG-FILES context parameter with
> /META-INF/navigation.faces.config.xml every thing is ok.
>
> Did I misunderstood something?
>
> Thanks
> Harry
> [Message sent by forum member 'hpollak' (harald.pollak_at_docpilot.org)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=381105
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: webtier-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: webtier-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>