Thanks for the Grizzly Rack support ; it's going to make everyone's
life much easier.
Supporting custom Rackup files is going to make it a lot easier for
other frameworks to play too,
so thanks for that. Does in make sense to add a 3rd 'application-type'
to make this clear?
i.e. you'd have 'rails', 'merb' and 'rack' as choices, and if it was
the 3rd you'd require the jruby-rackupscript parameter.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:29 AM, <glassfish_at_javadesktop.org> wrote:
> The one-pager for GlassFish v3 Scripting is now available for review and comment. The official review period is one week, so please post your comments and feedback in the form of reply to this mail thread by 20 Jan 2009. We will try to consider feedback that arrives after that but we cannot guarantee we will be able to do so.
>
> You can find the one pager here:
>
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/attach/V3FunctionalSpecs/Scripting-one-pager.html
>
> Generic v3 functional specification page is:
>
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=V3FunctionalSpecs
>
> Thank you in advance for your comments.
>
> -vivek.
> [Message sent by forum member 'vivekp' (vivekp)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=325877
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>