Hi Daniel
Thanks for your nice words. We are always looking for testimonials for
our Stories blog (
http://blogs.sun.com/stories). Please let us know if
you would be willing to participate. We will make it very easy for you,
and I'll try to throw a goodie too :-)
- eduard/o
glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
> Generally SJAS 9 behaves fine, all problems I could easy reproduce have been solved by the GF developers - they are very helpful.
>
> I have a current issue where SJAS seems to just stop - no log messages, but as Jan says don't base your decisions on 9.01 UR1, we have several instances and they all behave except one - but then it is serving millons of hits without any tunning...
>
> When I get a spare second I'll investigate my own stablity problem - or get a support contract :)
>
> I'd recommend SJAS/GF coming from JBoss myself, I choose SJAS at the time because we were moving from J2EE to JEE5, and at the time JBoss didn't have a certified EJB3 server. It has proven much easier to manage than JBoss, albeit a few teething problems.
> [Message sent by forum member 'danielrhoades' (danielrhoades)]
>
> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=229452
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
>