suggestions for improvements and things that didn't go quite
right are very much welcome in that testimonial too !
-Alexis
Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart a écrit :
> Hi Daniel
>
> Thanks for your nice words. We are always looking for testimonials for
> our Stories blog (http://blogs.sun.com/stories). Please let us know if
> you would be willing to participate. We will make it very easy for you,
> and I'll try to throw a goodie too :-)
>
> - eduard/o
>
> glassfish_at_javadesktop.org wrote:
>> Generally SJAS 9 behaves fine, all problems I could easy reproduce
>> have been solved by the GF developers - they are very helpful.
>>
>> I have a current issue where SJAS seems to just stop - no log
>> messages, but as Jan says don't base your decisions on 9.01 UR1, we
>> have several instances and they all behave except one - but then it is
>> serving millons of hits without any tunning...
>>
>> When I get a spare second I'll investigate my own stablity problem -
>> or get a support contract :)
>>
>> I'd recommend SJAS/GF coming from JBoss myself, I choose SJAS at the
>> time because we were moving from J2EE to JEE5, and at the time JBoss
>> didn't have a certified EJB3 server. It has proven much easier to
>> manage than JBoss, albeit a few teething problems.
>> [Message sent by forum member 'danielrhoades' (danielrhoades)]
>>
>> http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=229452
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>