On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 15:57, ITVGuy2000 wrote:
> Scott, thanks a lot.
>
>
> sdo wrote:
> >
> > I actually prefer running completely out of phyiscal memory (which is what
> > you're doing;
> > the 1GB of swap is your physical memory). So again, JDK 6 is your friend
> > here.
> >
>
> What about JDK 6 is a benefit here?
It's the same reason -- because JDK 6 will compile the JSPs in process,
it will not need to fork the JSP compiler, drastically reducing your
memory requirements.
-Scott
> ITVGuy2000
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Glassfish-Memory-Issues-tf4067129.html#a11567598
> Sent from the java.net - glassfish users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>