>>>>> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 20:09:58 +0700, Cay Horstmann <cay.horstmann_at_gmail.com> said:
CH> Thanks Ed! I think the rules changed. Originally, one of the rules was
CH> "Any initialization parameters start with javax.faces". That would
CH> have applied for me because I set the project stage. But the new rules
CH> that you cite only apply to javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES. Not something
CH> most people would fuss with...
We didn't want to map it to liberally.
CH> That's too bad. Hopefully we can go back to the old rule.
CH> I also noted that the rule "Any of the classes in the web application
CH> uses a JSF 2.0 annotation" is gone. That is ok--my classes had CDI
CH> annotations, and going forward, that's what one would expect.
I'm glad you agree with that one.
Ed
--
| edward.burns_at_oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017
| homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
| 2 Business Days til JSF 2.2 Early Draft Review
| 38 Business Days til JSF 2.2 Public Review
| 126 Business Days til JSF 2.2 Proposed Final Draft