Hi Laird and Harald
I see from the article that Weld has made some improvements.
http://relation.to/Bloggers/Weld101AndCDITCK101Published
3.1 Build 27 is : WELD-000900 1.1.0.01 (glassfish)
It would be good to know if this build has better properties.
regards
Richard
On 5 November 2010 14:11, Laird Nelson <ljnelson_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried using CDI from 3.0.1 onwards and simply could not get anything
> other than some basic injection to work well, ever. I've since ripped as
> much of it out as I can. I simply don't trust it; it has by far been the
> largest source of platform problems for me. Good idea, horrible execution.
>
> I will replace some of it and see what happens to RAM usage.
>
> L
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Richard Kolb <rjdkolb_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Harald
>>
>> On 4 November 2010 17:49, Harald Wellmann <harald.wellmann_at_gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://hwellmann.blogspot.com/2010/11/cdi-major-risk-factor-in-java-ee-6.html
>>>
>>
>> Very nice blog!
>>
>>
>>
>>> I would love to get your feedback on this:
>>>
>>> - Do you see a similar amount of memory used by Weld in your
>>> applications?
>>>
>>
>> In GlassFish 3.0 I started playing with Weld and was not very impressed.
>> And I must say running out of ram after lots of deploys is one of my pet
>> peeves.
>> So generally I stayed away from Weld as this seemed to add to the problem.
>> I assumed I may be using it incorrectly.
>>
>> regards
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>