Thanks Ludo !
Hi Noah,
"I've been thinking about trying out Weld in the latest promoted build",
would you like to give this a try,
it would be a good test. Thanks in advance :-)
Judy
Ludovic Champenois wrote:
> Judy Tang wrote:
>> No reply to this thread yet, would like to bring this up to see if
>> any one can help.
>>
> No issue. See the thread for explanation.
> Ludo
>
>> Thanks,
>> Judy
>>
>> Judy Tang wrote:
>>> Hi Noah,
>>>
>>> It is good to hear from you, thanks for forwarding this thread.
>>> Yes, it is interesting for us to know if Weld working with GlassFish.
>>> Let's wait to hear from expert :-)
>>>
>>> Here is part of info I got from the link Noah sent below:
>>>
>>> "Something weird is going on within Netbeans/Glassfish (build 70)
>>> since the IDE thinks the @Named annotation is in package
>>> javax.annotation.Named and there are no scope annotations available
>>> within the IDE. The IDE compiles and deploys the app just fine."
>>>
>>> Some Weld info, click to read more
>>> <http://www.seamframework.org/Weld>...
>>>
>>>
>>> Weld Overview <http://www.seamframework.org/Weld/WeldOverview>
>>>
>>> JSR-299 <http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=299>: Java Contexts and
>>> Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform (CDI) is the new Java
>>> standard for dependency injection and contextual lifecycle
>>> management. JSR-299 is a Java Community Process <http://jcp.org>
>>> (JCP) standard that integrates cleanly with the Java EE platform. In
>>> fact, Java EE 6 requires that all compliant application servers
>>> provide support for JSR-299 (even in the web profile).
>>>
>>> The JSR-299 specification (CDI) defines a set of services for the
>>> Java EE environment that make applications much easier to develop.
>>> JSR-299 layers an enhanced lifecycle and interaction model over
>>> existing Java component types including Managed Beans (JavaBeans)
>>> and Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB session beans). As a complement to the
>>> traditional Java EE programming model, the services provide:
>>> Thanks,
>>> Judy
>>>
>>> NBW wrote:
>>>> I've been thinking about trying out Weld in the latest promoted
>>>> build and I came across this thread on the Weld forums about a
>>>> problem someone is having trying to get a simple managed bean
>>>> running with GF build 70. Even though it's not my thread I thought
>>>> this might be of interest to the list -
>>>>
>>>> http://www.seamframework.org/Community/WeldAndGlassfishV3#comment103708
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Noah
>>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>