On 08/05/09 19:42, Gail Risdal wrote:
> Thanks, Judy and Kristian.
>
> A few more details regarding community doc reviews ...
>
> There will be a coordinated doc review period for GlassFish v3. Specific
> dates and details will be announced on the quality list and others, so
> stay tuned. Doc reviews will also again be part of FishCAT.
>
> In addition to these more 'formal' review activities, there are other
> ways to get involved:
>
> - Review the latest drafts posted on the doc comments wiki:
> http://wiki.glassfish.java.net/Wiki.jsp?page=GlassFishDocs
> You'll see the list of docs that are ready for review.
>
> - Review the content bundled in the latest builds (this includes the
> Admin Console GUI online help and CLI man pages).
Please do *not* review the Admin Console GUI online help at this time.
This help has not been updated in the builds since Preview.
Thanks!
Kim Haase
>
> - Watch for review notices from individual writers and review the docs
> as requested.
>
> Community doc reviews are extremely important. Thanks again for your
> contribution and commitment.
>
> Gail
>
> Judy Tang wrote:
>
>> Hi Kristian,
>>
>> Nice to hear from you. Hope you are having a good summer !
>>
>> Yes, Gail is the coordinator for community doc review. I will let her
>> send out an email
>> about the process. One can own FishCAT points too when reviewing doc
>> and file
>> bugs on doc. By the way we plan to have another FishCAT program to
>> involve
>> community to test GlassFish v3 after we reach v3 soft code freeze. We
>> will send out
>> email to recruit FishCAT members to help us do beta testing on v3.
>> May be you
>> can help us recruit a few FishCAT members, a big FishCAT surrounded by
>> a few new
>> FishCATs, that is how quality community will grow and a better quality
>> will come from :-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Judy
>>
>> Kristian Rink wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Judy,*;
>>>
>>> Judy Tang schrieb:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Would like to see more community review on our docs. It helps to
>>>> learn about GlassFish and also helps to improve doc quality.
>>>>
>>>
>>> is there a coordinated process of community reviewing documentation?
>>> I just
>>> once in a while spot these things here on quality@ and try providing
>>> what I
>>> have to add, for whatever it's worth... :)
>>>
>>> K.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: quality-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: quality-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>