persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: Code review for issue #1299

From: Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 06:37:00 +0530

Hi Gordon,

I removed that method because there is no longer a need to *override*
the superclass implementation. I think, it was earlier overridden
because PMTransactionManager was not allowing setRollbackOnly() to be
called directly. Now we are using a different TM which supports this
operations.

Thanks for reviewing,
Sahoo
Gordon Yorke wrote:
> Hello Sahoo,
> Looks fine to me, I see you removed the setRollBackOnly_impl method? Is that no longer required?
> --Gordon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM]On Behalf Of
> Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 2:15 PM
> To: Yorke Gordon J
> Cc: persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> Subject: Code review for issue #1299
>
>
> Hi Gordon,
>
> Would you mind reviewing the changes for
> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1299 ?
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
>