persistence@glassfish.java.net
why Embeddable and MappedSuperclass are required in persistence.xml file?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo <
Sanjeeb.Sahoo_at_Sun.COM
>
Date
: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 20:16:28 +0530
Hi,
I understand why a user has to specify *Entity* class in persistence.xml
on Java SE environment. But why does a user have to specify *Embeddable*
& *MappedSuperclass* list?
Thanks,
Sahoo
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Wonseok Kim: "Re: Idea for optimistic concurrency extension"
Previous message
:
Marina Vatkina: "Re: Idea for optimistic concurrency extension"
Next in thread
:
Tom Ware: "Re: why Embeddable and MappedSuperclass are required in persistence.xml file?"
Reply
:
Tom Ware: "Re: why Embeddable and MappedSuperclass are required in persistence.xml file?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]