persistence@glassfish.java.net

Re: [Issue 78] TopLink expects PU names to be unique across applications.

From: Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:48:02 -0800

Hi,

The combination of class loader and PU should be unique. So you could
have a static Map in the class loaded by the system class loader that
was keyed from the class loader, and the class loader-specific
structure has a Map of String to PU.

In order to clean up the Map at undeployment, you need an application
lifecycle callback or a weak Map.

Craig

On Dec 8, 2005, at 8:13 AM, Tom Ware wrote:

> Sahoo,
>
> I just had a quick chat with Mike Keith. And he is hoping we can
> come up with some ideas about how to uniquely identify the PU
> (since the name is not unique as mentioned below). When we come up
> with a good solution, it will be brought up as part of the spec
> discussions.
>
> Our initial suggestion is that the container provide some kind of
> identifier to the persistence provider in the PersistenceUnitInfo.
> This could possibly be a String pointing to the location of the
> persistence unit, a URL, or some other String that uniquely
> identifies the persistence unit when used in conjunction with the
> name.
>
> What do you think? Do you have any suggestions?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
> Tom Ware wrote:
>
>> The problem is that based on the information available, there is
>> no way to uniquely identify the PU and since the spec says that if
>> we call this method with the same PU, we have to redeploy, there
>> is know way to know which path to take. I have been told the spec
>> comittee is discussing this.
>>
>> -Tom
>>
>> Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>> I don't know what is the confusion here. Any way, can't we at
>>> least fix such that PU names does not have to be unique across
>>> the JVM?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sahoo
>>> tware_at_dev.java.net wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------- Additional comments from tware_at_dev.java.net Thu Dec 8
>>>> 13:57:26 +0000 2005 -------
>>>> The spec will be providing clarification about this issue. We
>>>> will make changes when the new information is available.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell_at_sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!