Sahoo,
I just had a quick chat with Mike Keith. And he is hoping we can come
up with some ideas about how to uniquely identify the PU (since the name
is not unique as mentioned below). When we come up with a good
solution, it will be brought up as part of the spec discussions.
Our initial suggestion is that the container provide some kind of
identifier to the persistence provider in the PersistenceUnitInfo. This
could possibly be a String pointing to the location of the persistence
unit, a URL, or some other String that uniquely identifies the
persistence unit when used in conjunction with the name.
What do you think? Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Tom
Tom Ware wrote:
>The problem is that based on the information available, there is no way
>to uniquely identify the PU and since the spec says that if we call this
>method with the same PU, we have to redeploy, there is know way to know
>which path to take. I have been told the spec comittee is discussing this.
>
>-Tom
>
>Sanjeeb Kumar Sahoo wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi Tom,
>> I don't know what is the confusion here. Any way, can't we at least
>>fix such that PU names does not have to be unique across the JVM?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Sahoo
>>tware_at_dev.java.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>https://glassfish.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=78
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>------- Additional comments from tware_at_dev.java.net Thu Dec 8 13:57:26 +0000 2005 -------
>>>The spec will be providing clarification about this issue. We will make
>>>changes when the new information is available.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>