Hi Amy,
more news. I just got a message with suject "Warning: could not send
message for past 4 hours". The text says:
Connection refused by asmx1.sfo.collab.net.
I hope this helps.
Regards Michael
> Hi Amy,
>
> I still have a problem with the persistence mailing list.
>
> Yesterday I sent a message to two persons directly and cc'ed the list
> (subject "EJBQL aggregates return type", date "Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:48:09
> +0100"). Up to now I did not get my own message and it does not show up
> in the mailing list archive. One of the persons I mailed directly
> responded and his reply is available on the list! The only difference I
> see is that my email included a jar attachment. Is this a problem?
>
> Regards Michael
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can you let me know if anyone is still experiencing problems with
>> mailing lists? We are trying to figure out %processed vs. %missing for
>> our mailing lists queue.
>>
>> Info on which mailing list and when the email was sent would be helpful.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amy
>>
>>
>>
>> Amy Roh wrote:
>>
>>> FYI, the latest update on GlassFish mailing lists delays.
>>>
>>> I have reported problems on dev_at_glassfish.dev.java.net and
>>> persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if your email didn't get sent to other mailing
>>> lists as well.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Amy
>>>
>>>> <snip> So, here is the current scenario. Spammers/virus had
>>>> saturated most of
>>>> the available smtp connections to Sun's smtp server, asmx1.sfo machine.
>>>> We can only determine if the email is spam or not after we establish
>>>> the
>>>> smtp connection. These smtp connections get maxed out soon. As a
>>>> workaround it would be possible to increase the # of smtp connections
>>>> allowed to asmx1.sfo. However there is a capacity problem with the spam
>>>> filter (Brightmail) which can't handle unlimited number of connections
>>>> to the filter process. CN operations are trying to minimize the spread
>>>> of the spam/virus at this point by:
>>>> 1) Adding known virus subjects to the mail server so that it will
>>>> reject
>>>> those mails;
>>>> 2) Limiting the # of sendmail processes so that we are allowing mail to
>>>> flow slowly but surely.
>>>> The Brightmail server as it exists now neither has neither clustering
>>>> facility nor the Virus scanning ability. The upgrade to the next
>>>> version
>>>> of Brightmail promises to reduce the occurrences of such mail delays
>>>> due
>>>> to spam/virus attacks.
>>>> </snip>
>>>> That said, can you still give me detail regarding mailing lists that
>>>> are still problematic, please?
>>>> Looking at persistence_at_glassfish.dev.java.net, which
>>>> was one of the lists reported as problematic last
>>>> week, I do see messages from 11/26 and 11/27. Have more messages
>>>> been sent since? I am also seeing archived messages in the list
>>>> dev_at_sip-communicator.
>>>> Note that if you received a system message
>>>> saying that the message has been deleted from
>>>> queue, I do not believe that this message
>>>> will be processed. You should probably resend those messages.
>>>> Thanks for the updates!
>>>>
>>>> Helen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>