On Thursday 09 June 2011 09:33 PM, Fabian Ritzmann wrote:
> On Thursday 09 June 2011 17:58:49 Sahoo wrote:
>> On Thursday 09 June 2011 08:08 PM, Sahoo wrote:
>>> Let me analyse the runtime impact of switching to Woodstox bundles as
>>> well. I will get back in a while.
>> After going through the email you had earlier sent me on this subject
>> and having looked at the OSGi metadata of the new woodstox bundles, I
>> see that they have stopped importing javax.xml.stream.* packages with a
>> lower version of 1.0, so I don't foresee any issues in runtime with the
>> new bundles. You can check in after getting a confirmation about the
>> licensing part.
> Cool, thx. We have a pre-approval to check in Woodstox 4.1.1 already while
> legal finishes its review. (We already have approval for Woodstox 4.0.8 and
> 4.1.1 only has minor bug fixes on top of that.)
Please check for stax2 api as it uses a different license than what's
used for other parts of Woodstox.
Sahoo