dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: QL failures

From: Lloyd Chambers <Lloyd.Chambers_at_Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:15:37 -0700

I'm trying Ken's gmbal update too. If it works, I'll commit pom.xml.

         <gmbal.version>3.0.0-b012</gmbal.version>

Lloyd

On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:

> Ok, I rebuild the latest GF trunk and re-ran QL on distributions/
> glassfish/target/glassfish.zip (am I doing the right thing?). I only
> got the one error, so I am not sure about the other one, but
> hopefully Lloyd is correct.
>
> I will proceed with the Felix release this weekend.
>
> -> richard
>
> On 9/4/09 18:38, Lloyd Chambers wrote:
>>
>> It's probably a timing thing due to the other failures. The server
>> log probably yields an indication of what, exactly.
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>
>>> I ran again and didn't get the iterateAllSanityCheck() failure
>>> this time, so I am not sure if that is a good thing or
>>> not...perhaps it is intermittent.
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
>>> On 9/4/09 18:10, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/4/09 17:16, Lloyd Chambers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Abhijit is trending strongly towards disabling the test for this
>>>>> reason (confusion).
>>>>>
>>>>> They indicate real problem with the ORB MBeans, but not problems
>>>>> that affect the overall server operation.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what it comes down to is what our policy in removing tests
>>>>> that detect real problems? I think it's kinda lame to have
>>>>> tests, then turn them off when real problems crop up.
>>>>>
>>>>> My other suggestion was to have the test itself emit a message
>>>>> indicating that it is a known issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have NOT seen amxtest.AMXCoreTests.iterateAllSanityCheck()
>>>>> fail, so that one needs looking into.
>>>>
>>>> Ok, so the other one is known, but this one is not. Hmm. I guess
>>>> I will look into it. :-(
>>>>
>>>> Here is the stack trace:
>>>>
>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>> at amxtest.AMXCoreTests.iterateAllSanityCheck(AMXCoreTests.java:
>>>> 94)
>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>>>> (NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
>>>> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
>>>> (DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
>>>> at org.testng.internal.MethodHelper.invokeMethod
>>>> (MethodHelper.java:604)
>>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:470)
>>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:564)
>>>> at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:830)
>>>> at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods
>>>> (TestMethodWorker.java:125)
>>>> at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run
>>>> (TestMethodWorker.java:109)
>>>> at org.testng.TestRunner.runWorkers(TestRunner.java:678)
>>>> at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:624)
>>>> at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:495)
>>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:300)
>>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:295)
>>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:275)
>>>> at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:190)
>>>> at org.testng.TestNG.createAndRunSuiteRunners(TestNG.java:792)
>>>> at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:765)
>>>> at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:699)
>>>> at org.testng.TestNG.privateMain(TestNG.java:824)
>>>> at org.testng.TestNG.main(TestNG.java:802)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -> richard
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lloyd
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I get the failure with:
>>>>>> amxtest.AMXCoreTests:testAMXComplianceMonitorFailureCount
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not clear if that's the same as the one reported in 9355.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, can we temporarily disable the test so that we get a clean
>>>>>> run every time? When the bug is fixed, we can re-enable it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jane Young wrote:
>>>>>>> I know #2 is a known issue. See IT 9355
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> http://gf-hudson.sfbay.sun.com/hudson/job/gf-trunk-build-continuous/2205/artifact/bundles/QL-GP-report.html
>>>>>>> I'm not sure about #1. Are you getting total of 2 failures or 1?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am trying to make sure that Felix 2.0 is ready for release.
>>>>>>>> My latest run comes up with the following QL failures:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. iterateAllSanityCheck
>>>>>>>> java.lang.NullPointerException
>>>>>>>> at amxtest.AMXCoreTests.iterateAllSanityCheck
>>>>>>>> (AMXCoreTests.java:94)
>>>>>>>> 2. testAMXComplianceMonitorFailureCount
>>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: Server indicates that there
>>>>>>>> are non-compliant AMX MBean validator failures, failure count
>>>>>>>> = 20, examine the server log for failures
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>> amxtest.AMXCoreTests.testAMXComplianceMonitorFailureCount
>>>>>>>> (AMXCoreTests.java:112)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are these normal failures in GF trunk?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -> richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Lloyd Chambers
>>>>> lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
>>>>> GlassFish Team
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>>>
>>
>> Lloyd Chambers
>> lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
>> GlassFish Team
>>
>>
>>

Lloyd Chambers
lloyd.chambers_at_sun.com
GlassFish Team