On Aug 21, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Sahoo wrote:
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>
>> if you are not deterred with option 1 then I think we should just
>> carry on like this. This is the safest option for our users, and we
>> should print a Warning so next release we remote the flag and
>> feature.
> Jerome,
>
> Did you mean option 1 or 2? Unless I am missing something, option #1
> can lead to broken applications after upgrade. Is it safer than
> option #2?
>
yes of course, I meant using the flag.
thanks for catching this.
Jerome
> By 1 & 2, I mean the following (taken from your earlier email):
> /1. we don't run the upgrade redeployment with the flag and
> applications that were not flagged as using a deprecated or
> incorrect feature in V1/V2 will fail to be upgraded correctly.
> 2. we run with the flag which mean that we automatically upgrade and
> run the already deployed applications in an incompatible mode.
> /
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>