Thanks for this information. Actually in some places somebody lowered
the priority with the justification that it will be automatically rised
again after GF2.1. Seems that automatic rise doesn't happen, so I'd like
to ask not to write info like that into the tracker. People like me
think it actually will happen.
So now I'll check all my 98 issues once more and rise those worth of
fixing (isn't it ironic? I mean, I do not spend ANY work into filing an
issue if I am not convinced that actually it IS worth fixing)...
Regards
Markus
From: Jerome.Dochez_at_Sun.COM [mailto:Jerome.Dochez_at_Sun.COM]
Sent: Freitag, 24. April 2009 18:31
To: dev_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
Subject: Re: When will "old" issues get fixed?
Hi Markus
I can see that most of your bugs are filed at P4, although I cannot
guarantee we will fix all 98 of them, I think you should raise the
priority (P3) of the ones that are particularly important to you so the
developers get notified and look at them. In theory all P1 to P3s are
fixed for FCS so if you can convince the developer that some of these
bugs are worthy P3 then it will have to be fixed.
jerome
On Apr 24, 2009, at 2:42 AM, Markus Karg wrote:
I understand that the road map for GFv3 ist very tight, but on the other
hand I'd like to ask whether "old" issues (reported in GFv2) will ever
get fixed? The reason is that I reported 98 issues of which not a single
issue got fixed so far. Some of them are violations of the Java EE 5
specification. So I wonder whether this ever will get fixed? Any plans?
Thanks
Markus