dev@glassfish.java.net

Re: javadocs?

From: Bill Shannon <bill.shannon_at_sun.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:08:59 -0700

Jerome Dochez wrote:
> it seems to me that you are aggregating the javadocs for the entire
> source tree of v3 which might not be that interesting. Probably
> something like this :
>
> <plugin>
> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
> <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
> <configuration>
> <excludePackageNames>com.*:org.*</excludePackageNames>
> </configuration>
> </plugin>

Right, I'm *sure* you don't want the javadocs from every class in the
product. Start with the javax.* classes and add whatever other classes
Jerome says are equivalent to public classes in the previous release.

Maybe we want a separate set of javadocs containing the exported APIs
for each module.