Sahoo wrote:
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>>>
>>> And completeness, not haphazard development is required for "products",
>>> especially, mature products.
>> this was certainly not meant to be a criticism
>>
>> java -jar glassfish.jar mysuperweb.war is *all* some developers need,
>> ever...
> Yes, some developers may be satisfied with that, but they will always
> be a subset of all developers using GF from NB. So, NB should use the
> mechanism that works for all, not for some.
just realized I just forgot to answer that part :P
Overall I agree that it is dangerous for Netbeans to just use java -jar
glassfish.jar.
However I had conversations with Byron or Kedar (again, my aging memory
failing) about providing a local command to export the java command that
the launcher would use to start the domain. This would allow NB to
basically substitute the launcher, have a direct reference to the
process handle (which is important for them) yet retaining the capacity
of respecting the domain.xml settings.
I don't think we will get that for prelude unless it's already there.
>
> I also think we need to prioritize what we want to fix at this point
> of time. Do we want:
> 1. asadmin start-domain working + java -jar working with some
> limitations + core features of server working
> OR
> 2. asadmin start-domain working + java -jar working - some core
> features of server working
>
> My assumption is we can't do both 1 & 2. So, we have a choice to make
> and I prefer #1.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>