On Jul 24, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Sahoo wrote:
> Jerome Dochez wrote:
>> I did not want to confuse folks about 3 and 100, maybe that was not
>> such a good idea. Anyhow I don't think it matters terribly if we
>> switch back to snapshots at some point.
>> now there is a more important subject I would like to discuss :
>> which version
> For which artifact? glassfish-api or for all artifacts built as part
> of v3. If you are asking for all artifacts, then this is what I was
> thinking a few days back:
> For all artifacts built out of v3, we would use 10.0.0 for prelude,
I am always confused with maven version as you can tell, but 10.0.0 is
"after" 10.0-SNAPSHOT ?
> 10.0.x for any patch/UR on top of prelude,
yes so that follows what I was suggesting assuming we don't have to
use 10.1.0 for prelude.
> 10.1.0 for release following prelude, and 10.2.0 for the next next.
> Obviously, this won't work any more, because we have already changed
> glassfish-api to use 10.0.1 :-( .
yes but that's ok, not all the modules have to have the same version
for all of them. we will have to do something special for glassfish-
api for prelude, after it will fall back on the same scheme as the
others.
>
>
> For all promoted builds and milestones, we can use qualifier.
>
> Thanks,
> Sahoo
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>