Lloyd Chambers wrote:
> I certainly sympathize. Right now there is *too much* to learn and
> know.
+1 This is the reason I've asked documenting / blogging about what's
changed and why?
>
> On Jul 18, 2008, at 12:07 PM, Harpreet Singh wrote:
>
>> Sahoo et al,
>>
>> Apologize for this - I am not too familiar with the v3 infrastructure
>> and I thought I had done my due diligence in terms of building
>> everything from source. Seems like I missed something obvious.
>> - Harpreet
>>
>> Sahoo wrote:
>>
>>> We continue to cause build failures for hours together. It is
>>> frustrating for developers who do want to follow the process and
>>> can't get their work done because of mistakes of others. Despite
>>> several requests, it appears that developers are not checking Hudson
>>> after check-ins. The build [1] failed for a very simple reason, a
>>> method name of interface/abstract class was changed, but the
>>> implementation was not changed;
>>>
>>> [INFO] Compiling 7 source files to
>>> /files/Hudson/workspace/glassfish-v3-devbuild/v3/flashlight/framework/target/classes
>>>
>>> /files/Hudson/workspace/glassfish-v3-devbuild/v3/flashlight/framework/src/main/java/org/glassfish/flashlight/impl/provider/FlashlightProbeProviderFactory.java:51:
>>> org.glassfish.flashlight.impl.provider.FlashlightProbeProviderFactory
>>> is not abstract and does not override abstract method
>>> <T>getProbeProvider(java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.Class<T>)
>>> in org.glassfish.flashlight.provider.ProbeProviderFactory
>>> public class FlashlightProbeProviderFactory
>>> ^
>>>
>>>
>>> A clean build in the local workspace should have caught it, right?
>>> OK, we got past the first barrier. How about the second check post -
>>> Hudson? A look at Hudson build status would have been sufficient to
>>> control the damage to only 30 mins. The build started failing at
>>> around 1630 PDT on Thursday and was not fixed until Jerome did so
>>> around 0200 PDT, causing the system to be in a bad state for *~8
>>> hours*. This included first half of working hours for Indian
>>> developers.
>>>
>>> I understand that we don't have the best build system yet, so that
>>> calls for extra caution from developers.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sahoo
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> http://hudson.sfbay/view/GFv3/job/glassfish-v3-devbuild/2039/changes#detail0
>>>
>>>
>>> Anissa Lam wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> After 'svn update', i cannot build the server any more. Here is
>>>> the error. Hudson is also showing the same.
>>>> Hope someone can take a look.
>>>>
>>>> thanks.
>>>> Anissa.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> [INFO] Building GlassFish Flashlight Framework
>>>> [INFO] task-segment: [install]
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> [INFO] [resources:resources]
>>>> [INFO] Using default encoding to copy filtered resources.
>>>> [INFO] snapshot
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight:flashlight-agent:10.0-SNAPSHOT: checking
>>>> for updates from glassfish-repository
>>>> [INFO] snapshot
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight:flashlight-agent:10.0-SNAPSHOT: checking
>>>> for updates from glassfish-repository-wsinterop
>>>> [INFO] snapshot
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight:flashlight-agent:10.0-SNAPSHOT: checking
>>>> for updates from java-dev-repository
>>>> [INFO] snapshot
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight:flashlight-agent:10.0-SNAPSHOT: checking
>>>> for updates from repo1.maven.org
>>>> [INFO] snapshot
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight:flashlight-agent:10.0-SNAPSHOT: checking
>>>> for updates from maven2.java.net
>>>> [INFO] snapshot
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight:flashlight-agent:10.0-SNAPSHOT: checking
>>>> for updates from maven2.java.net-backup
>>>> [INFO] [hk2:hk2-compile]
>>>> [INFO] Compiling 7 source files to
>>>> /export/Users/anilam/Awork/V3/v3-new/v3/flashlight/framework/target/classes
>>>>
>>>> /export/Users/anilam/Awork/V3/v3-new/v3/flashlight/framework/src/main/java/org/glassfish/flashlight/impl/provider/FlashlightProbeProviderFactory.java:51:
>>>> org.glassfish.flashlight.impl.provider.FlashlightProbeProviderFactory
>>>> is not abstract and does not override abstract method
>>>> <T>getProbeProvider(java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.String,java.lang.Class<T>)
>>>> in org.glassfish.flashlight.provider.ProbeProviderFactory
>>>> public class FlashlightProbeProviderFactory
>>>> ^
>>>> Note:
>>>> /export/Users/anilam/Awork/V3/v3-new/v3/flashlight/framework/src/main/java/org/glassfish/flashlight/impl/provider/FlashlightProbeProviderFactory.java
>>>> uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
>>>> Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
>>>> 1 error
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>>>> [INFO]
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> [INFO] Fatal error compiling
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>>> <mailto:dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>> <mailto:dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net>
>>>
>