We probably will not try to enhance hk2 module subsystem but there are
still a lot of hk2 features that can very useful for building server
side software, and it's a great application model on top of OSGi so
the answer to all your questions is no.
jerome
On May 20, 2008, at 5:26 PM, Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
> Sahoo,
>
> Is there any need to maintain HK2 anymore then? I think we need a
> definite
> strategy here. Also, HK2 has lot of config code in current design
> which
> I don't think has to do anything with modularity per se. Will/should
> that be
> folded into GlassFish in that case?
>
> - Kedar
>
> Sahoo wrote:
>> We are going to switch the default to Felix from HK2 in GFv3. We
>> would like to do it next week. You are requested to run your dev
>> tests on Felix mode and ensure that you don't see any difference
>> between HK2 mode and Felix mode.
>> Thanks,
>> Sahoo
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>