Even when we use Felix, only the module implementation layer of HK2 is
replaced by Felix, but we continue to use the config and auto-depends
module from HK2 [1]. There is no immediate need to move them to
GlassFish. They can stay where they are.
Thanks,
Sahoo
[1]
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/ss141213/archive/2008/04/glassfish_v3_on.html
Kedar Mhaswade wrote:
> Sahoo,
>
> Is there any need to maintain HK2 anymore then? I think we need a
> definite
> strategy here. Also, HK2 has lot of config code in current design which
> I don't think has to do anything with modularity per se. Will/should
> that be
> folded into GlassFish in that case?
>
> - Kedar
>
> Sahoo wrote:
>> We are going to switch the default to Felix from HK2 in GFv3. We
>> would like to do it next week. You are requested to run your dev
>> tests on Felix mode and ensure that you don't see any difference
>> between HK2 mode and Felix mode.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sahoo
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help_at_glassfish.dev.java.net
>